Independent research. A clearer mortgage perspective.
MortgageConsensus Index

PROVIDER FIT REVIEW/

Total Quality Lending Review for Self-Employed Investors Buying Rental Property

Total Quality Lending is a good fit for self-employed investors who want to buy a rental using bank-statement qualification instead of tax returns or DSCR.

Multiple AI perspectivesEvidence-led comparisonsOur editorial independence

RECOMMENDATION COVERAGE

Total Quality Lending

Recommended by 3 of 7 AI platforms in this study.

42.9%Consensus coverage · not a customer rating

The research in brief

Total Quality Lending is a good fit for a self-employed investor who wants to buy a rental property using bank-statement qualification instead of tax returns or DSCR rental projections. Three of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, at an average listed rank of 1.67 and a best rank of 1. The strongest reason to consider it is its published Prime Time program: 12- or 24-month personal or business statements, business-only statement acceptance, multiple business-income calculation methods, and a stated top-tier 85% investment-property purchase LTV. The main limitation is that rates, fees, and complete borrower-specific eligibility matrices are not publicly verified, and platform fit ratings ranged from strong to uncertain.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (Claude, Grok, Kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank1.67
Best listed rank1
Mortgage offeringPrime Time Bank Statement / Alt-Doc Program (12- or 24-month personal or business statements); Prime Time Non-QM Bank Statement Program
Overall use-case fitGood, but not conclusively best-priced
Research date2026-09-30

Why Total Quality Lending Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

  • Is Total Quality Lending a good choice for a bank statement loan for a self-employed rental purchase?
  • How many of the seven AI platforms actually named Total Quality Lending when ranking bank statement lenders?

Total Quality Lending qualified because it was named by three of the seven included platforms during ranking discovery, and because its published program directly matches the buyer's stated income methodology. The platforms that named it were Claude, Grok, and Kimi, with listed ranks of 1, 3, and 1 respectively [10]. That is a 42.9% share of included platform responses, which is a minority — four platforms did not name it in the ranking stage.

The qualification is use-case-specific rather than company-wide. The buyer here is a self-employed investor expanding a rental portfolio who wants to qualify using bank account deposits rather than DSCR rental projections or W-2 income. Total Quality Lending's public pages describe a non-QM bank statement program that uses deposits from 12 or 24 months of personal or business statements instead of tax returns or W-2s [10]. The same pages state that investment occupancy is supported, which is the specific eligibility question for a rental purchase [24].

Platform fit ratings were not unanimous. Anthropic and Grok rated the fit "strong"; ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity rated it "good"; DeepSeek and Kimi rated it "uncertain." That spread is itself a finding: the program description matches the use case, but the verifiable detail behind it does not satisfy every platform.

The mortgage offering in focus

Questions explored

  • Which Total Quality Lending program should a self-employed investor use to buy a rental property with bank statements?
  • Does Total Quality Lending's Prime Time program accept business bank statements only, or does it require personal statements too?

The relevant offering is the Prime Time Bank Statement / Alt-Doc Program, also described as the Prime Time Non-QM Bank Statement Program. It is the only Total Quality Lending product the platforms tied to this use case.

Underwriting uses eligible deposits from 12 or 24 consecutive months of personal or business bank statements instead of tax returns or W-2s, then applies an expense factor or another income calculation [24]. Deposits are not automatically treated as qualifying income; transfers, non-business deposits, and inconsistent activity require review [24].

The business path accepts 12 or 24 months of business statements only. Published business-income methods are a fixed 50% expense ratio, a third-party CPA/EA/tax-preparer expense ratio with a 10% minimum, or a third-party-prepared profit-and-loss statement [25]. The personal path generally requires 12 or 24 months of personal statements plus two months of business statements showing activity and transfers [10]. One platform reported that the personal path and the business path using the fixed 50% expense ratio do not require a CPA letter [11].

The program is presented as available for primary, second-home, and investment occupancies, including rental-property purchases [24]. Total Quality Lending also states that investment-property bank statement loans are a separate product from DSCR loans, which qualify on rental income rather than borrower income [10].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

  • What do the AI platforms agree on about Total Quality Lending's bank statement program for rental purchases?
  • Is Total Quality Lending's 85% investment-property LTV figure consistent across the platforms that reviewed it?

The platforms broadly agreed on the program's structure and its headline leverage figure, and they agreed that pricing is not publicly verifiable.

On structure, the agreement was strong. Multiple platforms reported that the program uses 12 or 24 months of personal or business bank statements rather than tax returns or W-2s [10]. Multiple platforms also reported that investment properties are eligible [24].

On leverage, the agreement was strong at the top tier. The published figure is up to 85% purchase LTV for an investment property at a stated top tier, including 720+ FICO and a loan amount of $2 million or less on the business-statement page [25]. A separate guide states 15% down as the lowest published investment-property down payment under Prime Time bank statements [22].

On credit and loan size, the published general parameters are a 620 minimum credit score and loan amounts from $150,000 to $4 million, with the highest investment-property LTV limited to stronger credit and specified loan-size tiers [10].

On pricing, the platforms agreed that nothing usable is public. No platform verified a borrower-specific rate, APR, points, lender-credit schedule, or a comparison against competing bank-statement lenders [24]. Agreement here reflects a shared evidence gap, not a shared endorsement.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

  • Why did some AI platforms rate Total Quality Lending "uncertain" for a self-employed rental purchase?
  • Is Total Quality Lending's maximum investment-property LTV 85% or 90%?

The platforms disagreed on fit rating, on the maximum investment-property LTV, on state licensing coverage, and on whether the program is even active in 2026.

Fit ratings split three ways: strong (Claude, Grok), good (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity), and uncertain (DeepSeek, Kimi). Deepseek ran without search enabled and could not confirm from reachable public sources that the bank statement program is actively offered in 2026, could not confirm investment-property eligibility or maximum LTV, and could not confirm whether Total Quality Lending underwrites in-house or brokers to a wholesale non-QM investor [9]. Kimi reported that the official website could not be directly accessed or indexed in its search results and that the recommended product names could not be verified against actual company disclosures [4].

On LTV, there is a documented conflict. The general bank-statement page describes investment-property LTV as ranging up to 90% in the broader program, while the business bank-statement page and the down-payment guide specify 85% purchase LTV for the top investment-property tier [24]. For this use case, 85% should be treated as the better-supported published ceiling; the 90% figure appears to relate primarily to primary residences or a broader matrix [24]. Perplexity separately reported that reviewed sources did not clearly publish exact investment-property LTV tiers for this bank-statement path [11].

On state coverage, one independent source lists 42 states, while a company page claims up to 46 states [30]. Anthropic reported a separate conflict, with one source listing 42 states and another listing 29 states for licensing [10].

On channel, the website describes the company as a direct non-QM lender and also provides wholesale/broker materials; the buyer should verify whether the transaction is direct, brokered, or originated through another channel [24].

Mortgage features for this borrowing need

Questions explored

  • How many months of bank statements does Total Quality Lending require for a rental-property purchase?
  • What leverage can a self-employed investor get from Total Quality Lending on an investment-property purchase?

The features most relevant to this buyer are statement duration, statement type, income calculation, leverage, reserves, and property eligibility.

Statement duration and type: 12- or 24-month options exist, and both personal and business statements are accepted [24]. One platform reported that 24 months can yield a smoother income average and sometimes better pricing [11]. One platform reported that the 12-month track functions as the standard expedited path while 24 months may be required for higher LTV brackets or larger loan amounts [17].

Income calculation: the business path offers three methods — fixed 50% expense ratio, third-party CPA/EA/tax-preparer expense ratio with a 10% minimum, or third-party-prepared P&L [25]. The business path's 50% default expense factor can materially reduce qualifying income for businesses with higher expenses; the CPA and P&L alternatives require qualified independent third-party preparation [25].

Leverage: up to 85% purchase LTV for an investment property at a top stated tier, including 720+ FICO and a loan amount of $2 million or less on the business-statement page [25]. This is a top-tier claim, not a universal limit; lower FICO, larger loans, specific property types, or state overlays may reduce leverage [24].

Reserves: published Prime Time reserve requirements are three months of PITIA at 80% LTV or below, six months at 80.01% to 85% LTV, and higher requirements for larger loan amounts or higher leverage [25]. One platform reported that loans above $1.5 million require nine months of reserves and loans above $2.5 million require twelve months [10].

Terms: published options include 15-, 30-, and 40-year fixed terms and 5/6, 7/6, and 10/6 ARMs [10]. Interest-only is stated to be available at 660+ FICO up to 90% LTV, but investment-property applicability and pricing require confirmation [10].

Property and state restrictions: the lender publishes eligibility for single-family properties, 2-4 units, condominiums, and certain other property types, with separate LTV limits. Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, and New York overlays are stated to cap purchase LTV at 85% and loan amount at $2 million [24].

Self-employment history: the public program page states that borrowers need at least two years of self-employment and business history; choosing the 12-month option does not waive that requirement [24].

Rates, fees, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

  • How much does a Total Quality Lending Prime Time bank statement loan cost for a rental purchase, and are there origination or CPA-letter fees?
  • Are there prepayment penalties or minimum-term requirements on Total Quality Lending's bank statement program?

Pricing is not publicly verifiable, and this is the single largest gap in the evidence. Total Quality Lending does not publish a usable rate sheet or complete fee schedule for an investment-property bank statement loan [24].

What is known: interest rate and APR are not publicly posted for the evaluated borrower scenario [24]. Normal mortgage transaction costs such as appraisal, title, escrow, recording, credit, and lender/origination charges may apply, but product-specific amounts were not verified [24]. A CPA, EA, tax preparer, or third-party P&L provider may create an additional borrower-paid cost when using the stated-expense-ratio or P&L method; the amount was not disclosed [24]. One platform estimated that a CPA letter, if required, adds roughly $300 to $800 in borrower cost and timeline [10].

Industry context, not a Total Quality Lending quote: bank statement loan rates in 2026 typically range from 0.50% to 1.50% higher than conventional mortgage rates, depending on credit score, down payment, and loan amount [31]. That is an independent industry figure and should not be read as this lender's pricing.

Contract terms: the public pages state that programs, rates, terms, and conditions may change without notice, and that approvals remain subject to underwriting guidelines [24]. The website states that it is not an offer or commitment to lend [24]. No public minimum loan term or prepayment-penalty policy was verified for this product [24]. One platform reported that no early prepayment penalties were mentioned in public documentation, but that is an absence of mention rather than a confirmed term [10].

Actual pricing is likely to depend on FICO, LTV, loan amount, property type, state, occupancy, term, reserves, and documentation method, but the specific pricing formula was not verified [24].

Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • Who is Total Quality Lending's Prime Time bank statement program best suited for among self-employed rental investors?
  • Is Total Quality Lending a good fit for a self-employed investor whose tax returns understate cash flow?

Total Quality Lending is best suited for self-employed investors whose tax returns understate cash flow because of business deductions, and who can document consistent deposits.

The strongest-fit profiles, based on the supplied platform findings:

  • Self-employed investors whose tax returns understate cash flow because of business deductions [24].
  • Borrowers with consistent deposits in an LLC, S-corporation, sole-proprietor business account, or personal account [24].
  • Investors seeking higher leverage than the lender's published DSCR alternative, subject to credit, loan size, property, reserves, and state overlays [24].
  • Borrowers who can document at least two years of self-employment or business history [24].
  • 1099 contractors and business owners expanding rental portfolios who have steady deposits but significant write-offs reducing tax income [10].
  • Borrowers with 620+ FICO who prefer a direct lender with in-house underwriting and a stated rapid close [10].
  • Borrowers who want either a personal or a business statement route, since both are published as available [13].

One platform reported that the company carries a 4.9/5 average across 500+ verified Google reviews from self-employed borrowers, 1099 contractors, and business owners using the Prime Time bank statement program, and that the most common compliments cite close speed and willingness to underwrite unusual self-employed profiles in-house [20]. That is a company-owned source and is not independently verified.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

  • Who should not choose Total Quality Lending for a bank statement loan on a rental property?
  • Is Total Quality Lending a poor fit for an investor whose rental property already qualifies on DSCR?

Total Quality Lending is probably not the best choice for investors who need published pricing before engaging, whose deposits are irregular, or whose rental property already qualifies comfortably on DSCR.

Specific poor-fit profiles from the supplied findings:

  • Investors whose rental property qualifies comfortably under DSCR and who prioritize property-cash-flow underwriting over personal-income documentation [24].
  • Borrowers requiring a publicly disclosed rate, fee schedule, or guaranteed lowest-cost execution before applying [24].
  • Borrowers with irregular, declining, heavily transferred, or difficult-to-source deposits [24].
  • Transactions exceeding the published loan-size, LTV, property-type, or state-overlay limits [24].
  • Investors in CT, FL, IL, NJ, or NY seeking to maximize leverage, since state overlays cap purchase LTV at 85% and loan amounts at $2 million [20].
  • Borrowers with fewer than 12 months of organized statements or highly irregular income patterns [10].
  • Borrowers with credit scores below 620 [17].
  • Borrowers with less than two years of active self-employment history [17].
  • Investors seeking the absolute lowest rate, since non-QM pricing typically runs above conventional and no rate sheet is published [31].

One platform also noted that the minimum loan amount of $150,000 may exclude very small investment acquisitions or syndication interests [10].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

  • What is a better alternative to Total Quality Lending for a self-employed investor whose rental property has strong cash flow?
  • When is a DSCR lender or a conventional lender a better choice than Total Quality Lending for a rental purchase?

A DSCR lender may be better when the property's rental income is strong, and a conventional lender may be better when the borrower can qualify on tax returns or W-2 income.

The supplied platform findings identify these alternative scenarios:

  • A DSCR lender is better when the property's rental income is strong, the buyer wants qualification based primarily on property cash flow, or personal bank-deposit documentation is weak [24]. One platform reported that if the property is purely a rental, a DSCR loan may be a cheaper, faster path that does not require personal income documents at all [14].
  • A conventional lender is better when the borrower can qualify using tax returns or W-2 income and prioritizes lower potential pricing and standardized terms [24].
  • Another non-QM lender is better when it offers a lower rate, lower fees, broader state coverage, higher LTV at the borrower's exact FICO and loan size, or more favorable treatment of multi-unit, short-term-rental, or entity-owned properties [24].
  • A lender with a published rate sheet or broker-comparison process is better when price transparency matters more than the program's stated documentation flexibility [24].
  • A lender with more detailed public disclosures is better when the buyer needs clearly published investor-property leverage tiers and closing terms [24].
  • A portfolio lender or another non-QM specialist may be necessary when the loan amount exceeds $2 million in an overlay state [20].

One platform named specific competing non-QM lenders — Angel Oak, Newrez, Citadel, Carrington, and JMAC — as comparison candidates for rate shopping [10]. Another platform cited Mbanc, LendSure, Lendmire, and Abo Capital as competitors with more transparent published investor program documentation [4]. These are platform-reported comparisons, not verified head-to-head pricing.

Questions to ask before choosing a lender

Questions explored

  • What should a buyer confirm with Total Quality Lending before signing a bank statement loan contract for a rental purchase?
  • Which Total Quality Lending program terms are unverified and need written confirmation?

The supplied platforms converged on a verification list. Buyers should get written answers to these before incurring nonrefundable third-party costs:

  • For the exact FICO, loan amount, property type, state, and occupancy, what is the maximum purchase LTV and required reserve level [24]?
  • Will the lender use business statements only, personal statements plus business statements, or require both for the borrower's entity structure [24]?
  • How are transfers, owner draws, cash deposits, inter-account transfers, and deposits from multiple businesses treated [24]?
  • Which expense method produces qualifying income for the business, and what documentation is required for a CPA/EA letter or P&L [24]?
  • Is two years of self-employment required in the exact fact pattern, and can prior related-industry experience count [24]?
  • What is the quoted rate, APR, points, lender credits, lock period, and total lender-controlled closing cost [24]?
  • Are there prepayment penalties, minimum-interest provisions, or restrictions on refinancing or selling the rental property [24]?
  • Is interest-only available for this investment-property purchase, and at what LTV, FICO, loan-size, and pricing conditions [24]?
  • Are LLC or other entity vesting, 2-4 unit properties, condominiums, short-term rentals, and properties with existing leases eligible [24]?
  • What are the appraisal, title, reserve, seasoning, rental-income, and property-condition requirements [24]?
  • Is the loan being made directly by Total Quality Lending or through a broker/wholesale channel, and who will service it after closing [24]?
  • Is the target state fully licensed for this specific Prime Time bank statement program [30]?
  • Can the lender provide a written loan estimate and program matrix before the buyer incurs nonrefundable third-party costs [24]?

The consensus assessment

Good fit, but not conclusively best-priced. Total Quality Lending's published Prime Time bank statement program closely matches a self-employed rental investor who wants deposit-based qualification and does not want DSCR underwriting. The strongest apparent advantages are business-only statement acceptance, 12- or 24-month options, multiple business-income calculation methods, and a published top-tier 85% investment-property purchase LTV.

The main decision gaps are unverified rates and fees, incomplete borrower-specific eligibility details, and conflicting broad-versus-investment LTV statements. Platform fit ratings ranged from strong to uncertain, and the two "uncertain" ratings came from platforms that could not verify program specifics from reachable public sources.

Obtain a written quote and compare it with at least one DSCR lender and one competing non-QM bank-statement lender. The consensus index for this category is available at bank statement loan for self-employed rental purchase, and the broader directory is at investment property and non qm mortgage lenders.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a structured multi-platform research run dated 2026-09-30. Seven platforms evaluated fit for the use case "bank statement loan for self-employed rental purchase": Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. Each platform returned a fit rating, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify.

Ranking statistics count only platforms that named Total Quality Lending during ranking discovery. Three of seven did: Claude (rank 1), Grok (rank 3), and Kimi (rank 1). The remaining four platforms did not name the entity in the ranking stage.

All factual claims are cited to supplied platform evidence using parenthetical citation IDs. Company-owned sources materially outnumber independent sources in this evidence set, so company claims are labeled as company-reported rather than independently verified. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.

Research limitations

Several limitations apply to this review.

Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations. Of the deduplicated sources, 29 are company-owned and 2 are independent. Company claims should not be read as independently verified.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-06-11, while the run research date is 2026-09-30. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Deepseek ran without search enabled, which limits its ability to confirm current program details. Its "uncertain" rating reflects that constraint as much as the underlying evidence.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Claims from platforms without retrieved citations are labeled platform-reported or unverified.

Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Where conflicts exist — including the 85% versus 90% investment-property LTV question and the 42-versus-46 state licensing question — the conflict is described and the buyer is directed to verify.

The complete Prime Time matrix, including exact investment-property LTV by FICO, loan amount, property type, state, and statement method, was not fully available in the reviewed public pages.

No independent source was found verifying advertised closing times, approval rates, customer outcomes, or rate competitiveness.

See the broader Self-Employed Investors Buying Rental Property consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  1. Bank Statement Loans for the Self-Employed: https://abocapital.com/bank-statement-loans/
  2. Bank Statement Loans | No Tax Returns: https://jd.mortgage/bank-statement-loans/
  3. Bank Statement Loan | Real Estate Investors: https://mbanc.com/blog/bank-statement-loan-real-estate-investors/
  4. Bank Statement Loans for Self-Employed: https://www.lendmire.com/bank-statement-loans/
  5. DSCR Loan vs Bank Statement Loan for Investors: https://www.lendmire.com/dscr-loan-vs-bank-statement-loan-for-investors/
  6. Bank Statement Loan | Self-Employed Mortgage: https://www.lendmire.com/loanoptions/bankstatementloan/
  7. Self-Employed Mortgage Loans Oregon & California | Bank Statement Loans: https://www.lumenmortgage.com/loans/residential/self-employed
  8. Total Quality Lending — Official Website: https://www.totalqualitylending.com
  9. Bank Statement Loans — Mortgages for Self-Employed Borrowers | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/bank-statement-loans
  10. 12-Month Bank Statement Loan — Self-Employed Mortgage | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/bank-statement-loans/12-month
  11. Business Bank Statement Mortgage — No Personal Income Mixing | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/bank-statement-loans/business
  12. Personal Bank Statement Mortgage — Self-Employed: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/bank-statement-loans/personal
  13. Bank Statement vs Traditional Mortgage — Which Wins? | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/bank-statement-vs-traditional-mortgage
  14. Best Mortgage Lender in the USA for Real Estate Investors | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/best-mortgage-lender-usa
  15. Best Non-QM Lenders 2026 — Top Lenders Ranked | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/best-non-qm-lenders-2026
  16. How to Qualify for a Bank Statement Loan | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/blog/how-to-qualify-for-a-bank-statement-loan
  17. Bank Statement Loan — Definition & Meaning | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/glossary/bank-statement-loan
  18. Housing History — Definition & Meaning - Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/glossary/housing-history
  19. Best Bank Statement Mortgage Lenders 2026 | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/learn/compare/bank-statement-lenders
  20. Bank Statement vs Traditional Mortgage — Which Wins?: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/learn/compare/bank-statement-vs-conventional
  21. Total Quality Lending — Loan Programs: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/loan-programs
  22. Bank Statement Mortgages for Self-Employed Borrowers: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/loans/bank-statement
  23. Total Quality Lending Reviews — 4.9 Stars on Google: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/who-we-are/reviews
  24. Self-Employed Mortgage — Business Owners & 1099 Workers | Total Quality Lending: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/who-we-serve/self-employed
  25. Official pricing and terms source: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/terms-of-use
  26. Official pricing and terms source: https://www.totalqualitylending.com/sms-terms

Independent Sources

  1. Total Quality Lending — STR, DSCR, and Conventional Loans in 42 states: https://rabbu.com/lender/total-quality-lending

TRANSPARENCY BY DESIGN

The evidence behind this study

Research is a dated snapshot of AI recommendations and their supporting sources. Use the original evidence and methodology to understand what these findings can—and cannot—tell you.

Independent source records
2
Provider-owned source records
29
Direct support records
27

AI platforms in the study

ChatGPTClaudeDeepSeekGrokPerplexityKimiGemini

Study limitations

  • The study date identifies this research snapshot; dates reported by AI platforms do not independently establish source freshness.
  • Recommendation counts measure mentions during the ranking stage. Later fit assessments do not increase those counts.
  • Product names, costs, and features can differ across sources. Confirm conflicting details directly with the provider.
  • Source URLs came from AI platform responses and were not independently validated during report preparation.
  • Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.
  • Some dates reported by AI platforms differ from the study date. Those dates do not independently establish that the information is current.

Affiliate & commercial disclosure

We may receive compensation when you follow certain links, request mortgage quotes, or take another qualifying action through a commercial partner. These relationships create a potential financial conflict, but do not influence recorded AI recommendations or ranking calculations. Partner availability, rates, fees, and eligibility can vary.

Read the full Affiliate Disclosure for compensation, tracking, partner availability, and research independence details, or contact us with a disclosure question.

Verify the source snapshot

SHA-256: 409203f3b2e289bf92ab5bf03d8f50a58b38347c05da3e48c6985c1a94f1af1e